Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Diederichs v. State Highway Commission

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1931No. 6,832PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion:

2Per curiam

In this proceeding the relator seeks an injunction restraining the State Highway Commission, the Governor, Secretary of State and State Treasurer from issuing or selling any of the debentures provided for in Chapter 1 of the 1931 Session Laws, which is called the ‘ ‘ State Highway Treasury Anticipation Act of 1931.”

For the purpose of matching funds set apart by the government in order to build Federal Aid Highways, the Act authorizes the sale of debentures, to be paid from motor fuels’ excise taxes, the collection of which is anticipated. It is already provided by statute that all…

3Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Malott v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  2. State Ex Rel. Richards v. MoorerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  3. State v. Camp SingMontana Supreme Court · 1896
  4. State ex rel. Bonner v. DixonMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  5. State Ex Rel. Fletcher v. Executive CouncilSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by58 opinions

  1. Gruen v. State Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Boswell v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Boe v. FossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Johnson v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  5. State Ex Rel. Capitol Addition Bldg. Commission v. ConnellyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1935

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API