Legal Opinion

O'Connell v. State Board of Equalization

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1933No. 7,159PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart

This is an original proceeding instituted by Brian D. O’Connell, a taxpayer, against the State Board of Equalization, the members thereof, the Attorney General, county attorney of Lewis and Clark county, and the Governor of the state, as officials charged with the enforcement of Chapter 181 of the Laws of the Twenty-Third Legislative Assembly, approved March 16, 1933. The complaint recites the enactment of the law, that defendants are charged with the execution thereof, and that they are about to proceed to put the same into effect, and will do so unless restrained by this court.

Chapter 181…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Bell's Gap Railroad v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Smith v. CahoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Louisville Gas & Electric Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Reed v. BjornsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  2. Mills v. State Board of EqualizationMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Hale v. State Bd. of Assessment and ReviewSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. State Ex Rel. Sparling v. HitsmanMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  5. State Ex Rel. Dufresne v. LeslieMontana Supreme Court · 1935

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API