Legal Opinion

Kelley v. Baldwin, Auditor General

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 28, 1935No. 144PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This is a taxpayer’s bill to restrain certain officers of the Commonwealth, and the Security Bank Note Company of Philadelphia, a corporation, from printing, executing and issuing tax-anticipation notes under the Act of June 22, 1935, and paying out any money pursuant to it. Plaintiff contends that the act is repugnant to article IX, sections 4 and 5 of the Constitution. An answer was filed. The issue is one of law.

The principal question is whether the notes, if issued, will constitute a debt of the Commonwealth within the meaning of that word as used in article IX, section 4,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Tranter v. Alleghency County Co. AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Sharpless v. Mayor of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Schnader v. LiverightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Appeal of the City of ErieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  5. State v. McCauleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Daly v. HemphillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Philadelphia Life Insurance v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Sablosky v. MessnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Hertz Drivurself Stations, Inc. v. SigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Land Holding Corp. v. Board of Finance & RevenueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API