Kelley v. Baldwin, Auditor General
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
This is a taxpayer’s bill to restrain certain officers of the Commonwealth, and the Security Bank Note Company of Philadelphia, a corporation, from printing, executing and issuing tax-anticipation notes under the Act of June 22, 1935, and paying out any money pursuant to it. Plaintiff contends that the act is repugnant to article IX, sections 4 and 5 of the Constitution. An answer was filed. The issue is one of law.
The principal question is whether the notes, if issued, will constitute a debt of the Commonwealth within the meaning of that word as used in article IX, section 4,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Tranter v. Alleghency County Co. AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Sharpless v. Mayor of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Schnader v. LiverightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Appeal of the City of ErieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
- State v. McCauleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Daly v. HemphillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Philadelphia Life Insurance v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Sablosky v. MessnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Hertz Drivurself Stations, Inc. v. SigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Land Holding Corp. v. Board of Finance & RevenueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.