Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Bonner v. Dixon

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1921No. 4,787PublishedCited by 60 opinions

Original application for injunction by tbe State, on the relation of James H. Bonner, against Jos. M. Dixon, Governor, and others, constituting the state board of examiners. 1. Initiative Measure No. 19 is a law relating to appropriations of money and therefore not subject to the initiative under the provisions of Article Y, section 1, of the Constitution. . It is fundamental that in so far as the Constitution of this state offers no restriction, the law-making body has…

Read the full summary

Original application for injunction by tbe State, on the relation of James H. Bonner, against Jos. M. Dixon, Governor, and others, constituting the state board of examiners. 1. Initiative Measure No. 19 is a law relating to appropriations of money and therefore not subject to the initiative under the provisions of Article Y, section 1, of the Constitution. . It is fundamental that in so far as the Constitution of this state offers no restriction, the law-making body has plenary legislative power {In re Pomeroy, 51 Mont. 119, 151 Pac. 333), and no distinction is to be made in this regard…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Galen

This is an original application for an injunction to enjoin the issuance and sale of bonds of the state of Montana proposed to be issued by the defendants under authority contained in Initiative Measure No. 19, passed by the people at the general election held on November 2, 1920, “for the construction, repair and equipment of buildings at the State University, Missoula; College of Agriculture and Mechanic Arts, Bozeman; School of Mines, Butte; Normal College, Dillon; Orphans’ Home, Twin Bridges; School of Deaf and Blind, Boulder; Industrial School, Miles City; Yoeational School for Girls,…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. People ex rel. McCauley & Tevis v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. State ex rel. Hay v. AldersonMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Hill v. RaeMontana Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Commonwealth ex rel. Bell v. PowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  5. Pickle v. FinleyTexas Supreme Court · 1898

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Brooks v. ZabkaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  2. State Ex Rel. Malott v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Gas Products Co. v. RankinMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Grossman v. State, Dept. of Natural ResourcesMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State Ex Rel. Diederichs v. State Highway CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 1931

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API