Legal Opinion

Zurcher v. Herveat

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 10, 2000No. Docket 206948PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitbeck, P.J.

Plaintiffs Diane Zurcher and James Zurcher appeal as of right the trial court’s denial of their pretrial motion for summary disposition, arguing that a document signed by them and defendant Barbara Herveat constituted a binding contract for the Zurchers’ purchase of Herveat’s real property in Torch Lake Township. The basic issue before us is whether there was a binding contract between the parties or whether Herveat’s additions to the purchase agree-*271merit converted her acceptance into a counteroffer. The resolution of this issue is complicated by the fact that the underlying action was one…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Kruse v. HempWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Forge v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Opdyke Investment v. NORRIS GRAIN COMPANYMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Gault v. StormontMichigan Supreme Court · 1883

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Burkhardt v. BaileyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Phillip v. Marsh-MonsantoSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017
  3. Calhoun County v. Blue Cross Blue ShieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. In Re Rudell EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Lakeside Oakland Development, LC v. H & J Beef Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2002

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API