Forge v. Smith
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBoyle, J.
We granted leave to determine whether the trial court erred in granting defendants’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict because plaintiffs’ claim of express easement failed to satisfy the requirements of the statute of frauds. We affirm the decision of the trial court because we find that the plaintiffs failed to establish a claim as a matter of law.
i
Diane Smith and Thomas Faber were co-owners of six contiguous lots in the city of Detroit. Faber, Smith, and her husband Leonard Smith entered into a twenty-five-year lease with the plaintiffs for three of the six parcels, described…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Hi-Way Motor Co. v. International Harvester Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Cardinal Mooney High School v. Michigan High School Athletic Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
- United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Powers v. HarlowMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BlackMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- Sniecinski v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Mike's Train House, Inc. v. Lionel, L.L.C., Korea Brass and Yoo Chan YangCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- James Lossia, Jr. v. Flagstar Bancorp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Zaher v. MiotkeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- Kitchen v. KitchenMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.