Legal Opinion

Lakeside Oakland Development, LC v. H & J Beef Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 3, 2002No. Docket 226903, 228797PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.

The trial court granted summary disposition, pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(10), in favor of plaintiff Lakeside Oakland Development, L.C., (seller) against defendants James W. Crawford and Harry Eiferle, Jr., and defendant/third-party plaintiff H & J Beef Company (buyers) in this real property action. The trial court also granted a motion for summary disposition by third-party defendants Thomas A. Duke Company and Mark W. Szerlag (realtors), pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(8) and (10), with regard to H & J’s third-party complaint. The trial court further ordered H & J to pay $7,273 in costs and attorney…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Quinto v. Cross and Peters Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Smith v. Globe Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. M&D, INC v. McCONKEYMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Simko v. BlakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Forge v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Kloian v. Domino's Pizza, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Harte-Hanks Direct Marketing/Baltimore, Inc. v. Varilease Technology Finance Group, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2004
  3. Botsford Continuing Care Corp. v. Intelistaf Healthcare, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. KELLY-STEHNEY & ASSOCIATES, INC v. MacDONALD’S INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS, INCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. Bank One, NAMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API