Gault v. Stormont
Michigan Supreme Court
Error-to Wayne. (Jennison, J.) Eoeoible ENTRY and detainer. Complainant appeals. Where possession has been retaken by force after being-surrendered a complaint in forcible entry and detainer proceedings should allege the force: Latimer v. Woodward 2 Doug. (Mich.) 368 ; Hoffrrwn v. Harrington 22 Mich. 57.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
This is a proceeding for forcible entry and detainer tried before a commissioner, and appealed to and *637tried in the circuit court where the defendant had judgment. From the finding by the circuit judge the following facts appear. . *
On April 26, 1881, the plaintiff, who resides in the county of Shiawassee, was owner of a house and two lots in Wyan-dotte, which were then occupied by one Sill as tenant. Sill had paid rent up to and including May 1, 1881. On the day first mentioned defendant bargained with plaintiff for the purchase of the place, and they agreed upon one thousand and fifty…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hogsett v. EllisMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
- Dwight v. CutlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1855
- Druse v. WheelerMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Druse v. WheelerMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Hall v. SouleMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Ryan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Halsell v. Renfrow and EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
- Opdyke Investment v. NORRIS GRAIN COMPANYMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Halsell v. RenfrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
- Simpson v. GreenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.