Legal Opinion

Zikratch v. Stillwell

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 27, 1961No. Civ. 6246PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShepard, J.

J.—This is an appeal from a judgment for damages against defendant real estate broker for alleged secret profits.

Facts

The pertinent facts shown by the record before us are substantially as follows: Although there was some dispute as to detail and as to inferences to be drawn, most of the material facts were established without serious conflict.

Plaintiffs owned certain land in Riverside, California. Defendant was a real estate agent (later a broker) working out of the office of a broker named Mathis. Defendant was asked by two businessmen named Adams and Gunnison of Riverside to look for some…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Brewer v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Grupe v. GlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Coughlin v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Pollak v. StauntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Evans v. FaughtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Tackett v. CroonquistCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Earle v. LambertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API