Legal Opinion

Pollak v. Staunton

California Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1930No. Docket No. S.F. 13226PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSea Well, J.

Plaintiff brought action to recover from defendants upon a common count for money had and received the sum of $21,532.49. Upon receipt of $5,000 from defendants Berger and Staunton, the action was dismissed as to them and as to the defendant Western Lead Mines Company. From a judgment entered against defendant Salsberry for the balance, to wit, $16,532.49, said defendant appeals. The sum of $21,532.49 was the price for which 20,000 shares of stock of the Western Lead Mines Company, a Nevada corporation, owned by plaintiff, were sold by defendant Staunton. The proceeds of the sale were divided…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Smith v. BachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. People v. PaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. Minor v. BaldridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Tatterson v. KehrleinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Reilly v. ClyneArizona Supreme Court · 1925

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Mary Pickford Co. v. Bayly Bros., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Kneeland v. EmertonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. Robbins v. Pacific Eastern Corp.California Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Barnes v. Eastern & Western Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1955

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API