Legal Opinion
Tackett v. Croonquist
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 31, 1966No. Civ. 7918PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhelan, J.
Defendants appeal from a judgment imposing liability for negligent misrepresentations following a non jury trial.
Plaintiffs Marvin F. Tackett (Tackett) and Elizabeth S. Tackett were owners of a motel property encumbered by trust deeds. They advertised it for sale or exchange. About the same time, one Lohr furnished to defendant Croonquist, a licensed real estate broker, the description of 73 acres of unimproved land that Lohr owned and wished to sell or exchange, on which he placed a value of $1,000 per acre. Defendant Carter was a licensed real estate salesman working out of Croonquist’s…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Morgan Clark v. MillsapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Estate of BentonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- De Bairos v. BarlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Kessler v. SappCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Jolton v. Minster Graf & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Twomey v. Mitchum, Jones & Templeton, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Hayes v. ReevesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- Ziswasser v. Cole & Cowan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Monty v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Veach v. Meyeres Real Estate, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.