Legal Opinion
Earle v. Lambert
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 6, 1962No. Civ. 19425PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtAgee, J.
The Earles, husband and wife, were awarded $11,500 as damages against Lambert and were denied any recovery as against Dorward and his wife. This resulted in three appeals. Lambert appeals from the judgment against him. The Earles cross-appeal as to the adequacy of the award. They also appeal from the judgment in favor of the Dorwards.
Lambert and Dorward are licensed real estate brokers. At the time in question, Dorward lived in Paso Robles but worked out of Lambert’s office in San Francisco as a salesman. Lambert met the Earles socially in 1950 and they became close friends. The Earles owned…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Seeger v. OdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Simone v. McKeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Gates v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Bate v. MarstellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Byron Jackson Iron Works v. HogeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tackett v. CroonquistCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966