Legal Opinion

Estep v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1985No. 15327PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALTERS, Justice.

Lorrine Estep, as Personal Representative of the estate of her deceased husband, James T. Estep, and in her individual capacity as an injured claimant, sought a judgment against State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company to declare that the exclusion of coverage for household members in an automobile liability insurance policy is invalid or, in the alternative, that she is covered by the uninsured motorist provisions of the policy. The trial court granted summary judgment for State Farm on both claims. Mrs. Estep appeals.

On July 18, 1982, Lorrine was a passenger in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. WiscombWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Sorensen v. SorensenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. Transamerica Insurance v. RoyleMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Hughes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Chavez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Potesta v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. National County Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Hartford Insurance v. ClineNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WagamonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API