Legal Opinion

Brown v. Merlo

California Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1973No. Sac. 7947PublishedCited by 279 opinions

Watt & Leverenz and Reginald M. Watt for Plaintiff and Appellant.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TOBRINER, J.

Section 17158 of the Vehicle Code, California’s “automobile guest statute,” 1 deprives an injured automobile guest of any recovery for the careless driving of his host unless the injury results from the driver’s willful misconduct or intoxication. Thus, in those cases which the statute reaches, the provision withdraws from automobile “guests,” i.e., passengers who give no compensation for their ride, the protection against negligently inflicted injuries which Califorina law generally affords to all others. Plaintiff, an automobile guest who has been foreclosed by this…

2Cases cited80 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by279 opinions

  1. Hale v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. J'Aire Corp. v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. Slater v. BlackwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Hawkins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

274 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API