Legal Opinion
Bank of Boston Connecticut v. Avon Meadow Associates
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 5, 1996No. 13326PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to collect on an unpaid promissory note. The defendants1 do not contest the award to the plaintiff of $2,205,911.77 on the complaint, but instead challenge the denial of their counterclaim.
*538The defendants claim that the trial court improperly (1) failed to rule, as a matter of law, that the release that they executed was ineffective as to their counterclaim, (2) instructed the jury on estoppel, and (3) instructed the jury on the effect of an agreement to execute a subsequent release. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury could reasonably have…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Mulligan v. RiouxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Levine v. MasseySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Ismert and Associates, Inc. v. New England Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Rosenblit v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Town of Ridgefield v. Eppoliti Realty Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Rosato v. RosatoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Mariculture Products Ltd. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of LondonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Rosato v. RosatoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Benedetto v. BenedettoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.