Legal Opinion
Levine v. Massey
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 21, 1995No. 14989PublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.
The plaintiffs, Robert A. Levine and Stephen C. Wardlaw, both medical doctors, and the named defendant, James Y. Massey III (defendant), the owner and operator of a medical laboratory, collaborated to invent a device utilizing a capillary tube and an interior float that, upon centrifugation, separated a blood sample placed in the tube into constituent parts in discernible measurable layers (capillary tube-float device). This unique device was of substantial value to the medical profession because it permitted quick blood analysis. In 1976, Levine, Wardlaw and Massey jointly applied for and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Sturman v. SochaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Barnard v. BarnardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Mulligan v. RiouxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Tallmadge Bros. v. Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- United Illuminating Co. v. Wisvest-Connecticut, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Petereit v. S.B. Thomas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Poole v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Levine v. Advest, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.