Legal Opinion
Rosenblit v. Danaher
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 2, 1988No. 13139PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
The ultimate issue on this appeal concerns whether the trial court, M. Hennessey, J., erred in dismissing the plaintiffs’ action on the ground of lack of personal jurisdiction under the Connecticut long arm statute, i.e., General Statutes § 52-59b,1 over *127the named defendant, William K. Danaher, Jr., who is an out-of-state resident. We find no error.
The following background circumstances are set out in order to place in proper context our determination of this matter. The plaintiffs, Jack L. Rosenblit, Jack S. Joseph and Gino Marchetti, who constitute a Connecticut general partnership known as…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Durfee v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Semmes Motors, Inc., Suing on Behalf of Itself and Together With Ford Dealers Alliance, Inc., Etc. v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- McCutcheon & Burr, Inc. v. BermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Carothers v. CapozzielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Texaco, Inc. v. GolartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Miller v. KirshnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Daley v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.