Legal Opinion

Hackett v. Hammel

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 26, 1932No. 28,727PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stone, J.. Action by payee against maker of a promissory note. The trial without a jury resulted in a decision for defendant. Plaintiff appeals from the order denying his motion for amended findings or a new trial.

In 1918 defendant was engaged in litigation wherein the stake was an interest in a northern Minnesota iron mine. Plaintiff advanced $705 to aid defendant in the prosecution of the case, in the language of the findings, “pursuant to an agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant that if said defendant was successful in said litigation, the defendant would pay to plaintiff ten…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Huber v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  2. Goodrich v. Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  3. Jacobson v. BarnesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  4. Andrus v. Dyckman Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ness v. Gurstel Chargo, P.A.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
  2. McKellips v. MacKintoshSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Craig v. BaumgartnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  4. Pamela Maslowski v. Prospect Funding Partners LLC, Prospect Funding Holdings LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  5. Vos v. Albany Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API