Legal Opinion
McKellips v. MacKintosh
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 25, 1991No. 17245PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YOUNG, Circuit Judge.
Roger D. McKellips (McKellips) appeals from an order granting summary judgment in favor of Donald P. Mackintosh (Mackintosh), Gary Lamberty (Lamberty), Brevet International, Inc. (Brevet), and Dakota Industries, Inc. (Dakota). The circuit court granted summary judgment stating that “Plaintiff’s [McKellips] claims against the Defendants are void and against public policy.”
FACTS
On June 11, 1986, Mackintosh and Lam-berty, both officers of Dakota, made a formal presentation to the State Bank of Al-*927cester for an operating loan of $15,000 for Dakota. McKellips, acting on behalf…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hunt v. HuntSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Bottum v. HerrSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Schnabel v. Taft Broadcasting Company, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Petition of BrockmuellerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Weatherwax v. Hiland Potato Chip Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hohm v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Currey v. CurreySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. ShadboltSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- A. Unruh Chiropractic Clinic v. De Smet Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Mt. Rushmore Hotel Corp. v. Commerce Bank (In Re Mt. Rushmore Hotel Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.