Andrus v. Dyckman Hotel Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Two actions in the district court for TIennepin county. The-cases were consolidated by order of court and tried before Hale, J.,. who made findings and ordered judgment for $116,870.61 against, defendant hotel company and for specific performance against defendants Collins. Defendants’ motion to amend the findings or for a new trial was denied. From the judgment entered pursuant to-the order for judgment, defendants appealed.
Read the full summary
Two actions in the district court for TIennepin county. The-cases were consolidated by order of court and tried before Hale, J.,. who made findings and ordered judgment for $116,870.61 against, defendant hotel company and for specific performance against defendants Collins. Defendants’ motion to amend the findings or for a new trial was denied. From the judgment entered pursuant to-the order for judgment, defendants appealed. From an order denying their motion to vacate the judgment and amending and supplementing their answers and crossbills and for a new trial, defendants appealed. From an…
1Opinion of the CourtPhilip E. Brown, J.
Plaintiff brought two actions, one against the Dyclnnan Hotel Co., of Minneapolis to recover for rent and taxes paid under a written lease dated May 1, 1909, of the hotel property, to defendant Collins and by him assigned to the hotel company; the other against. *419tbe same defendant and Collins and wife to enforce specific performance of a covenant by the lessee, contained in tbe same lease, to assign to plaintiff another lease, made to Collins, of property adjoining; tbe hotel and controlling its light and air. After consolidation and-trial to tbe court by consent, it found for plaintiff in a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Carver v. BagleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Turner v. FrybergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- First National Bank v. TowleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Cooper v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Dodge v. McMahanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Woodville v. MorrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- S. T. McKnight Co. v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- Hackett v. HammelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Sward v. NashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Banner Grain Co. v. Burr Farmers Elevator & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.