Legal Opinion
Ness v. Gurstel Chargo, P.A.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 21, 2013No. Civil No. 11-3370 (JNE/JSM)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JOAN N. ERICKSEN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Carol M. Ness, Jay Xiong, and Timothy J. Peters bring this action on behalf of themselves and a putative class against Defendants Gurstel Chargo, P.A. (“Gurstel Chargo”); TEM Capital, L.L.C. (“TEM”); Todd Gurstel (“Gurstel”); Mitch Chargo (“Chargo”); and John/Jane Does 1-20 alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) and of Minnesota state law. This case is before the Court on Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint.1 For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants Defendants’ motion.
I.…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Paul Handeen v. Gregory A. Lemaire Henry Lemaire Patricia Lemaire, Orlins & Brainerd Law Firm Richard K. Brainerd Peter I. OrlinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Wendelyn Harvey v. Great Seneca Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Thomas v. HaslamDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2018
- Strei v. BlaineDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Thomas v. HaslamDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2018
- Prospect Funding Holdings, LLC v. SaulterAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
- Garduno v. Autovest LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.