Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Sheinbein

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 16, 2002No. Misc. AG No. 37, Sept. Term 2001PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CATHELL, Judge.

Bar Counsel, on behalf of the Attorney Grievance Commission, petitioner, and at the direction of the Review Board, filed a petition with this Court seeking disciplinary action against Sol Sheinbein, respondent,1 pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-709(a).2 The petition alleges that respondent violated provisions of Rule 8.4 of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct (MRPC) based on complaints from Bar Counsel and Henry R. Quintero.3 The relevant provisions of Rule 8.4 provide that:

“It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to:(b) commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. AgnewCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. Cherry-MahoiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HodesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PostCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. KapoorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API