Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Sigalov

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 2012No. 2011-0120PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Vlad Sigalov of Cincinnati, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0070625, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1999.

{¶ 2} Sigalov is a sole practitioner engaged in a practice centering on personal-injury, immigration, and criminal cases. He accepts approximately 1,000 individual claims per year, and as recently as 2009, earned more than $2.5 million in gross settlement revenues and approximately $800,000 in fees.

{¶ 3} Relator, Cincinnati Bar Association, filed a second amended complaint 1 with the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, setting forth seven…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Bar Association v. WiestOhio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. People v. ZiankovichSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. Reinheimer (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  4. People v. CohenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
  5. Dinara Alymova v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API