Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens
Since 1980, the Immigration and Nationality Act has provided two methods through which an otherwise deportable alien who claims that he will be persecuted if deported can seek relief. Section 243(h) of the Act, 8 U. S. C. § 1253(h), requires the Attorney General to withhold deportation of an alien who demonstrates that his “life or freedom would be threatened” on account of one of the listed factors if he is deported. In INS v. Stevic, 467 U. S. 407 (1984), we held that to qualify for this entitlement to withholding of deportation, an alien must demonstrate that “it is more likely than not…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3,396 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
3,391 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.