Cincinnati Bar Association v. Wiest
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} Respondent, Christopher D. Wiest of Fort Mitchell, Kentucky, Attorney Registration No. 0077931, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 2004 and in Kentucky in 2005. He was employed by Thompson Hiñe, L.L.P., from September 2005 through July 2012 and throughout the course of his employment performed environmental due-diligence services 1 for firm client Stanley Works, later known as Stanley Black and Decker (“Stanley”), a publicly traded company. Those services were typically related to Stanley’s proposed mergers, acquisitions, or divestitures.
{¶ 2} In December 2014, relator,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State ex rel. Parisi v. Dayton Bar Ass'n Certified Grievance Comm., Court of Appeals of Ohio, Second District, Montgomery County2017
- Disciplinary Counsel v. Reinheimer (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- Disciplinary Counsel v. Mancino.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- Kentucky Bar Association v. Christopher David WiestKentucky Supreme Court · 2017
- Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. WiestOhio Supreme Court · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.