Legal Opinion

Mohler v. Jeke

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 7, 1991No. 1929PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAUGH, Judge.

This is an appeal from the entry of a compulsory nonsuit against the plaintiff in favor of defendant J & K Personal Care Home. For the reasons stated hereinafter, we affirm the order of the lower court denying appellants’ motion to remove the nonsuit.

The facts are as follows. One of the plaintiffs in this case, John Mohler 1 , was a seventy-six year old male suffering from declining health. He became a resident at the J & K Personal Care Home in February of 1985. On several occasions as a result of medical conditions, Mr. Mohler was brought to the hospital to be examined. On…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ClaypoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Maize v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Scott v. PurcellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Patentas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  5. Reimer v. TienSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Redland Soccer Club, Inc. v. Department of the Army of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. McClellan v. Health Maintenance OrganizationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Feeney v. Disston Manor Personal Care Home, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Miller v. Group Voyagers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Kalinowski v. EI Du Pont De Nemours and Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API