Legal Opinion

Reimer v. Tien

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 20, 1986No. 03248PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This appeal comes to us as the result of the judgment of the trial court granting a compulsory non-suit, on all counts, as to appellee Paul S. Tien (“Tien”), a directed verdict as to appellee American University of the Caribbean (“AUC”) on three counts, and from the jury award of $3,500 against appellee AUC.

The pertinent facts are as follows. After reading an advertisement in a local paper, appellant contacted AUC for information regarding its medical program. At the appropriate time she applied for admission and was subsequently accepted. In conjunction with this, she paid…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Sinn v. BurdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Incollingo v. EWINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Strickland v. University of ScrantonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Daughen v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Samarin v. GAF Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Clay v. Advanced Computer Applications, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Houston v. Texaco, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API