Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Claypool

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 26, 1985No. 12 W.D. Appeal Docket 1984PublishedCited by 140 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

LARSEN, Justice.

This appeal concerns the admissibility of a statement made by appellee (the defendant) to his victim, during the commission of a sexual assault, to the effect that he had a prior criminal conviction for rape. For the reasons which follow, we conclude that the Superior Court erred in holding that this evidence should have been excluded, and we, therefore, reverse.

In this case, appellee was convicted of rape, involuntary deviate sexual relations and simple assault, all arising from the sexual assault of his wife’s sister in 1979. According to the victim,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MorrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. StockardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. BartlettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Commonwealth v. ClaypoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

3Cited by140 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Commonwealth v. LarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. LaCavaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Commonwealth v. CoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API