Legal Opinion
Miller v. Group Voyagers, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 26, 1996No. 2:95-cv-05443PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOYNER, District Judge.
The defendant in this diversity case, Group Voyagers, Inc., d/b/a Globus (“Globus”), has submitted a motion asking us to dismiss the plaintiffs’ complaint on the grounds that it fails to state a claim on which relief can be granted. Alternatively, the defendant asks that we issue an order striking Exhibit “A” to the complaint. For the reasons that follow, we will deny the defendant’s motion in its entirety.
BACKGROUND
The facts, as recited in the complaint, are as follows. The plaintiffs are Betty and Carl Miller, a wife and husband who contracted with…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Tobye R. Markowitz, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Northeast Land Company. Appeal of Tobye R. MarkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Robertson v. Allied Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Schrob v. CattersonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Morena v. South Hills Health SystemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Ransom v. MarrazzoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Mest v. Cabot Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Zaloga v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Hanover Insurance v. RyanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Simmons v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Daniel Boone Area School Dist. v. Lehman Brothers, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.