Legal Opinion

Scott v. Purcell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 30, 1980No. 780PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KAUFFMAN, Justice.

This appeal is from the order of the Superior Court reversing the entry of an order of compulsory nonsuit. 1 In 1971, appellee, Thomas A. Scott (“Scott”), brought an action in equity against appellants, Robert Purcell (“Purcell”) and Oaklander Associates (“Oaklander”), seeking a constructive trust on certain real estate on the ground that Purcell had breached an agreement to act as agent for Scott in its purchase by taking title in the name of Oaklander. After completion of Scott’s testimony on the issue of liability, the trial court granted appellants’ motions for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McRoberts v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Schwartz v. Urban Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Martino v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Girard Trust Bank v. SweeneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Yezbak v. CroceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Etoll, Inc. v. Elias/Savion Advertising, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Kazatsky v. King David Memorial Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Basile v. H & R BLOCK, INC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Hightower-Warren v. SilkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Torchia on Behalf of Torchia v. TorchiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API