Legal Opinion
Ceslik v. Winer
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 10, 2001No. AC 14367PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*651 Opinion
DALY, J.
The plaintiff, Stephen Ceslik, appeals from the denial of his motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) ruled on his substituted motion for new trial without holding a hearing and (2) denied his motion for a new trial. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our disposition of this appeal. The plaintiff brought an action to recover on a promissory note, which was heard by an attorney trial referee. The attorney trial referee…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gerber & Hurley, Inc. v. CCC Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Leverty & Hurley Co. v. Commissioner of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- City of Hartford v. Pan Pacific Development (Connecticut), Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Summerbrook West, L.C. v. FostonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- State v. Louise-JulieConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
3Cited by1 opinion
- Modugno v. Colony Farms of Colchester, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008