Legal Opinion

Danielson v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 24, 1959No. 37,643PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dell, Chief Justice.

In this case a bam, owned by plaintiffs and insured by defendant, collapsed. This action was instituted to recover on an insurance policy which insured against loss from fire and, because of extended coverage, windstorm. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiffs, and defendant appealed from the denial of its alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.

Plaintiff Karl A. Danielson was an employee of Thorpe Brothers, a real estate company in Minneapolis. Mr. Danielson and his wife, the other plaintiff herein, purchased a farm in Blue Earth…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Hanson v. Homeland Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. Zuber v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  3. Motor Vehicle Casualty Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  4. Cement, Sand & Gravel Co. v. Agricultural InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  5. Anderson v. Connecticut Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jacoboski v. PraxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  2. American National Bank and Trust Company, as Trustee Under Trust Agreement, No. 11152 v. Aetna Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  3. Couri v. Home InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  4. Cormican v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  5. Rauk v. VoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API