Jacoboski v. Prax
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Donald C. Odden, Justice. *
This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying plaintiffs’ alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the jury verdict or a new trial.
Plaintiffs’ motion was based on two grounds: (1) The verdict was not justified by the evidence; (2) the trial court should have granted plaintiffs’ motion for a directed verdict at the close of the testimony.
Plaintiffs’ cause of action arises out of an accident occurring September 25, 1962, wherein plaintiff Ramona Biniek Jacoboski was seriously injured when she fell from the fender of an automobile driven by…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Fonda v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Lovejoy v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Anderson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Lindgren v. VogeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Smith v. Otto Hendrickson Post 212, American LegionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Sullivan v. F. D. Chapman Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Zinnel v. Berghuis Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Duchene v. WolstanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Dean v. WeisbrodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- PMH PROPERTIES v. NicholsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.