Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Connecticut Fire Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 7, 1950No. 35,094, 35,095, 35,096, 35,097PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Appeal from orders denying defendants’ alternative motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.

Defendant insurers, four in number, each issued to plaintiff an insurance policy for $12,000 insuring him against all loss or damage to his building from “windstorms, cyclones, and/or tornadoes,” subject, however, to the proviso that the insurer “shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused by snowstorm, blizzard, frost or cold weather; * * The insured building, known as the Bar Harbor dance hall and tavern, is a one-story structure located in Cass county on…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Ermentrout v. Girard Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  3. Jordan v. Iowa Mutual Tornado InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  4. Mork v. Eureka-Security Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  5. Gibbs v. Central Surety & InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Henning Nelson Construction Co. v. Fireman's Fund American Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Hauenstein v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. Boedigheimer v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. Joseph Friedberg v. Chubb & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  5. Gillis v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1965

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API