Rauk v. Vold
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Murphy, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order denying judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial after a special verdict in favor of plaintiff in an action for personal injuries and for damage to his automobile. Defendant contends that plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law and that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. He contends in the alternative that a new trial should be granted because of erroneous instructions.
Viewing the record in the light most favorable to the verdict, it appears that the parties were…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cameron v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Lott v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Zurko v. GilquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Tollefson v. EhlersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Cormican v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986