Legal Opinion

Rauk v. Vold

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 17, 1964No. 39,091PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Murphy, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order denying judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial after a special verdict in favor of plaintiff in an action for personal injuries and for damage to his automobile. Defendant contends that plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law and that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. He contends in the alternative that a new trial should be granted because of erroneous instructions.

Viewing the record in the light most favorable to the verdict, it appears that the parties were…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cameron v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Lott v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  3. Zurko v. GilquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  4. Tollefson v. EhlersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  5. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  3. Cormican v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  4. State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API