Legal Opinion

Mazur v. Merck & Co., Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 29, 1990No. Civ. A. 85-6494PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DITTER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Lisa Marie Mazur and her parents, Anthony and Edna Mazur, claim that Lisa contracted subacute sclerosing panen-cephalitis (“SSPE”), a debilitating, terminal disease of the central nervous system, as a result of an inoculation with a measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine manufactured by defendant Merck & Co., Inc. Before me is defendant’s motion for summary judgment and to exclude plaintiffs’ expert testimony.

The Mazurs brought this diversity action asserting claims of strict liability and negligence for both design and manufacturing defects and for…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Eck v. Parke, Davis & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  2. Lineberger v. WyethSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Carlin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Rubanick v. Witco Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  5. Feldman v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API