Lineberger v. Wyeth
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
GANTMAN, J.:
¶ 1 Appellant, Patricia R. Lineberger, asks us to determine whether the trial court erred when it granted summary judgment in favor of Appellee, Wyeth f/k/a American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Division of American Home Products Corporation (‘Wyeth”), and dismissed all of Appellant’s claims with prejudice. We hold Appellant waived her issues on appeal, because her court-ordered Rule 1925(b) concise statement of matters complained of on appeal was vague and overly broad. Appellant also waived the Nanty-Glo1…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. DowlingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Kaczkowski v. BolubaszSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by174 opinions
- JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. MurraySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. ReevesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Hess v. Fox Rothschild, LLPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Krentz v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- DeArmitt v. New York Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
169 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.