Legal Opinion

Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 3, 1985No. 83-1925PublishedCited by 1,313 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marshall

The question presented is whether the federal regulations governing the collection of blood plasma from paid donors pre-empt certain local ordinances.

t — I

Appellee Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc., is a Florida corporation that operates, through subsidiaries, eight blood plasma centers in the United States. One of the centers, Tampa Plasma Corporation (TPC), is located in Hillsborough County, Florida. Appellee’s plasma centers collect blood plasma from donors by employing a procedure called plasmapheresis. Under this procedure, whole blood removed from the donor is separated into plasma…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,313 opinions

  1. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

1,308 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API