Legal Opinion

Carlin v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1996No. S045912PublishedCited by 132 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, Acting C. J.

In this case we address the question whether a plaintiff alleging injury from ingesting a prescription drug can state a claim against the manufacturer for strict liability and breach of warranty for failure to warn about the known or reasonably scientifically knowable dangerous propensities of its product. We conclude that she can.

In our recent decision in Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1993) 53 Cal.3d 987 [281 Cal.Rptr. 528, 810 P.2d 549] (hereafter Anderson), we held generally that manufacturers are strictly liable for injuries caused by their failure to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Stevens v. Parke, Davis & Co.California Supreme Court · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by132 opinions

  1. Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Stephen Wendell v. Glaxosmithkline LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Johnson v. American Standard, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2008
  4. T.H. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Bigler-Engler v. Breg, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2017

127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API