Carlin v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, Acting C. J.
In this case we address the question whether a plaintiff alleging injury from ingesting a prescription drug can state a claim against the manufacturer for strict liability and breach of warranty for failure to warn about the known or reasonably scientifically knowable dangerous propensities of its product. We conclude that she can.
In our recent decision in Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1993) 53 Cal.3d 987 [281 Cal.Rptr. 528, 810 P.2d 549] (hereafter Anderson), we held generally that manufacturers are strictly liable for injuries caused by their failure to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Stevens v. Parke, Davis & Co.California Supreme Court · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by132 opinions
- Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Stephen Wendell v. Glaxosmithkline LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Johnson v. American Standard, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2008
- T.H. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Bigler-Engler v. Breg, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2017
127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.