Legal Opinion

Feldman v. Lederle Laboratories

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 24, 1991PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

CLIFFORD, J.

In Feldman v. Lederle Laboratories, 97 N.J. 429, 479 A.2d 374 (1984) (Feldman I), we held that under the doctrine of strict products liability, “drug manufacturers have a duty to warn of dangers of which they know or should have known on the basis of reasonably obtainable or available knowledge.” Id. at 434, 479 A.2d 374. At the retrial following our remand, plaintiff argued that Declomycin, an antibiotic manufactured by defendant, Lederle Laboratories (Lederle), had permanently turned her teeth gray, and that the drug had been defective…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. Carlin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Perez v. Wyeth Laboratories Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  4. Rowe v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  5. Franklin Tower One, L.L.C. v. N.M.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1999

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API