Legal Opinion

Rubanick v. Witco Chemical Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 1, 1991PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

HANDLER, J.

In this case, the Court must determine the standard governing the admissibility of expert evidence relating to the causation of cancer in toxic-tort litigation. The survivors of two men who had worked at a chemical plant where they had been exposed to a toxic substance, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), claim that their decedents’ fatal colon cancer was caused by that exposure. The Law Division conducted a hearing to determine whether plaintiffs’ expert testimony that PCBs had caused the fatal colon cancer of the victims was admissible.…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. John W. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  3. In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  4. In Re Paoli Railroad Yard Pcb LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  5. State v. KellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. Deborah Townsend v. Noah Pierre (072357)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
  2. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  3. State v. HarveySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  4. Hisenaj v. KuehnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  5. State v. MichaelsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API