Legal Opinion

MacMillan Co. v. Clarke

California Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1920No. Sac. No. 3113PublishedCited by 47 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandamus to compel the issuance of list of high school text-books as required by section 1750 of the Political Code. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloane, J.

This is an application for a writ of mandate to require the respondents, the state board of education and the state superintendent of instruction, to issue a list of high school text-books in conformity to the requirements of section 1750 of the Political Code.

The only question presented is as to whether said section of the Political Code has been repealed and a different procedure substituted by the act of the legislature entitled, “An act to provide for the adoption of text-books for use in the public high schools of the state and for furnishing textbooks for the use of pupils of such…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Hughes v. EwingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. State ex rel. Clark v. Haworth, School Trustee of Monroe School TownshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Ex Parte McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Honey Creek School Township v. BarnesIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. County of Alameda v. JanssenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Roth Drug, Inc. v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. American Co. v. City of LakeportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Collins v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API