Ingram v. Colgan
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Upon joint petition of appellant and respondent this cause was ordered to be heard in Bank for the determination of the single question whether or *116not the act under consideration (“An act fixing a bounty on coyote scalps,” Stats, of 1891, p. 280) made appropriation for the payment of claims arising under it.
The opinion heretofore rendered (filed October 80, 1894) stands confirmed, and what is now added is to be construed with it.
The objections raised to the sufficiency of the act are: 1. That no appropriation at all is made by it; 2. That, if an appropriation is made, that appropriation is…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Lincoln County v. LuningSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Wilkinson v. LelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Thorpe v. Rutland & Burlington RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854
- People ex rel. McCauley & Tevis v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Gin S. Chow v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Heron v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- State Ex Rel. O'Connell v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- California Association for Safety Education v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- City of Oakland v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.