Legal Opinion

Rathbun v. Herche

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1948No. Docket No. 68, Calendar No. 44,201PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

In this suit for specific performance of a preliminary agreement for the contract purchase of a seven-story office building in Grand Rapids, plaintiff, Milo D. Rathbun, prevailed and defendant, Marshall F. Her che, has appealed. The preliminary agreement as finally signed by the parties reads:

“I agree to purchase, through H. P. Deeb and M. G. Deeb, from Marshall P. Herche, the property known as the Ashton Building, lot 3, section 17, plat village of Grand Rapids, Campau plat, Kent county, Michigan, 74-78 Ionia ave., N. E., Grand Rapids, Michigan, for the sum of $140,000, the terms as follows:…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ogooshevitz v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Brin v. MichalskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Smith v. MathisMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Miller v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Milner Hotels, Inc. v. EhrmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Zurcher v. HerveatMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Dassance v. NienhuisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. People v. BayerMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. James M Moore Trust v. James Eric MooreMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Zurcher v. HerveatMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API