Legal Opinion

Smith v. Mathis

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1913No. Docket No. 36PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Mandell, J. Rill by Isaac Smith against Rose Mathis and Edward Mathis for specific performance of a contract for the sale of land. From a decree for defendants, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Complainant filed his bill of complaint pray*263ing for the specific performance of an agreement made between him and the defendant Rose Mathis, the memorandum in writing of which is as follows:

“$50.00.
“Received from Isaac Smith, of Detroit, Michigan, the sum of $50.00 to apply on purchase price of $9,500.00 for the following piece of real estate in Detroit, Michigan: the southwest corner of Alfred and Hastings street, same extending 95 feet on Hastings street, and 53 feet on Alfred St., together with buildings at present on same. I agree at once to furnish said Smith with a Burton or Union Trust…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Scott v. BushMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Bowen v. LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Wardell v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Wilkinson v. HeavenrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Mull v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Ogooshevitz v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Hunt v. State Highway CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Walsh v. OakmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Randazzo v. KroenkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Pangburn v. SiffordMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API