Legal Opinion

Dassance v. Nienhuis

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 7, 1975No. Docket 18282PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtT. M. Burns, P. J.

An understanding of the chronology of events in the instant case is necessary for a proper consideration of defendants’ questions on appeal.

On February 14, 1972, defendant Nienhuis, the owner of certain desirable land fronting on Pleasant Lake in Wexford County, listed that land for sale with defendant Bennett, a real estate broker. The listing was for a proposed price of $26,000, with $10,000 down, but subject to two leases which ran through 1975.

During April and early May of 1972, defendant Emmons submitted several different offers to purchase the Nienhuis property, all of which were…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AllenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Alexander v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Oppenhuizen v. WennerstenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Meyering v. RussellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. American Cedar & Lumber Co. v. GustinMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Feldman v. GreenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Lee v. AiuHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Trepel v. Pontiac Osteopathic HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Richards v. TibaldiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Formall, Inc. v. Community National BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API