Legal Opinion
Ogooshevitz v. Arnold
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 26, 1917No. Docket No. 141PublishedCited by 43 opinions
Appeal from Wayne; Hosmer, J. Bill by Isaac Ogooshevitz and another against Fred Arnold and another for the specific performance of a land contract. From a decree dismissing the bill, plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.
The bill in this case is filed to obtain the specific performance of the following contract:
“Detroit, Mich., Oct. 31,1911.
“Received of Isaac Ogooshevitz, the sum of fifty dollars to apply on the purchase money of the following described premises, to wit: House and lot known as 706 Antoine St. Said premises being situated in the city of Detroit, county of Wayne, and State of Michigan. Fred Arnold and Mary Arnold, of the city, hereby agree to sell, and Isaac Ogooshevitz, of the city, hereby agrees to purchase, the above-described premises for the sum of $3,800.00, thirty-eight hundred dollars,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Fagan v. HookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Howe v. CoatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Brin v. MichalskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- People v. CampMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Smith v. MathisMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Ray v. WoosterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- Caveny v. ASHEIMOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Cramer v. BallardMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- In Re Estate of JeffersMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Bartos v. CzerwinskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.