Frye v. Wiles
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
Plaintiffs have grouped their three assignments of error into two arguments in their brief. In the first argument they contend-that the trial court committed reversible error by allowing defendants’ motion to set aside entry of default against defendants. We disagree.
In setting aside an entry of default, as opposed to a default judgment, a showing of excusable neglect is not necessary. Acoustical Co. v. Cisne and Associates, 25 N.C. App. 114, 212 S.E. 2d 402 (1975). Under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 55(d), all that needs to be shown to set aside an entry of default is good cause. Crotts v.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Whaley v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Crotts v. Camel Pawn Shop, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- PIONEER ACOUSTICAL COMPANY INC. v. Cisne and Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Nicholson v. DeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
3Cited by8 opinions
- Byrd v. MortensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Bailey v. GoodingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Britt v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Williams v. JennetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Hasty v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.