Legal Opinion

Whaley v. Rhodes

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 16, 1970No. 708SC672PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Judge.

Plaintiff assigns as error (1) the conclusion of law of the trial judge to the effect that the defendant’s failure to file an answer was the result of excusable neglect; and (2) the action of the trial judge in granting the motion to set aside and vacate the entry of default against the defendant.

When an entry of default has been made by the Clerk of the Superior Court, a motion to vacate that entry is governed by the provisions of Rule 55(d) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure, which became effective 1 January 1970. Rule 55(d) provides as follows:

“(d) Setting aside…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Alopari v. O'LEARYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Elias v. PitucciDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Teal v. King Farms Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Welch v. KearnsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Kulakowich v. BorgestadDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Bell v. MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. North American Acceptance Corp. v. SamuelsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Peebles v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Crotts v. Camel Pawn Shop, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Basnight Construction Co. v. Peters & White Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API