Bailey v. Gooding
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge. 1
We first consider the interlocutory order of Judge Stevens. This order is void and must be vacated for two reasons. First, the “judgment” which it purports to set aside pursuant to Rule 60(b) was an entry of default, not a final judgment by default. Pendley v. Ayers, 45 N.C. App. 692, 263 S.E. 2d 833 (1980). Rule 60(b), by its express terms, applies only to final judgments. An entry of default may be set aside, not by motion pursuant to Rule 60(b), but by motion pursuant to Rule 55(d) and a showing of good cause. Pendley v. Ayers, supra. Second, even had defendants proceeded…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- In Re BurtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Peebles v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Whaley v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- London v. LondonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Roane-Barker v. Southeastern Hospital Supply Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- RC ASSOCIATES v. Regency Ventures, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Tradewinds Airlines, Inc. v. C-S Aviation ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- Stone v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Basnight Construction Co. v. Peters & White Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.